Racing and Sports now moderates the Talkback forum to ensure posting guidelines are adhered to.
The views expressed on Talkback are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Racing and Sports. You must be a registered user to write postings or send messages to other users. Click here to register.
Now that's a 3-0 statistic one can't avoid. But I'd really like to get Bellinda's input here as she has presented herself as the resident Caulfield Cups expert. 'There's a FALL!!!...oh no it..it..looks like it might be Bald Fright'.
I REPEAT thick ears that I have no problem with you backing up the 1940 claim. Not a care in the world. And having a fourth CC run at Flemington only further showcases what a massive blunder Bell Flight made in the first place. The fact that you took so long to respond on the Caulfield Cups shows that you hadn't a clue about the Caulfield Cups run at Flemington. Only that it was Pinkline Jones you wanted to have a go at, you sent your pea brain into frenzy overdrive with the end result of proving nothing against my point.
So there is no need for me to have anything confirmed so in your feeble attempt to escape the flogging that I've given you and Bald Fright.
HERE'S THE CRUX: Bell Flight played the smart alec card and suffered a catastrophic hydraulics failure in implying that there were never ANY Caulfield Cups run at Flemington as a carry-on of one of an infantile attempt at humour. I proved Bell Flight horribly wrong.
And surprise surprise no surprise - in come Count Plod, one of the most useless posters in forum history followed closely by Nappy Pants Tiggsworth. Neither of these two cretins are man enought to admit that they have all failed miserably.
Message: Pinkline.....The terrible twins airing their copy and paste brains again. as usual. Not long ago Tiggerish wouldnt consider anything that hadn't raced for 28 days ....Fool didn't know that up to 1400 [ which is most races Au wide] .....Highest percentage are won by horses that haven't run for 28 days = 1 st up, compared to 2 nd up, 3 rd up etc.....Then it took a month to explain the WFA scale to the retard ....But still he lines up ...all attack ...The College of Knowlege our Tige and of course his mate the CoUNT ....can't even spell....lol and then he calls our respected Leader a dimwit..Shame
Message: "WRONG AGAIN re: Best 3yo's. Every 3yo listed was exceptional. Surround was brilliant and I have already stated that I wouldn't argue with her placing in such a shortlist. However, she did all her 3yo racing in Victoria whereas Sunline won in both Sydney and Melbourne. To imply that I've put some kind of clearly inferior 3yo's in Surround's place indicates a very poor knowledge of thoroughbred quality assessment"
Most intelligent race watchers all know that Surround won twice in Brisbane, winning the Grand Prix and Qld Oaks. You failed to list the most successful filly in the last 35 yrs as one of the best 3yr, yet you dont even know what she won or where she raced.
Stick to hanging around school yards lecturing kids you chump, racing certainly isnt your forte.
Now, back in the corner and put that dunce hat back on
Message: 'Surround was brilliant and I have already stated that I wouldn't argue with her placing in such a shortlist. However, she did all her 3yo racing in Victoria whereas Sunline won in both Sydney and Melbourne.'
Looks like not only is the Caulfield Cup run at Flemington, but Surround also won the AJC Oaks and the Queensland Oaks in Victoria.
WR0NG AGAIN. The fact that you are supporting two clowns and showing bias on this shows YOUR low level. Bald Fright tried to play the smart alec and hit the dust. Count Plod then went into bat and he's just been sent back to the pavilion with another duck.
I guess it's pretty clear why I call you Tiggsy Tot when you carry on with the sub five year old 'humour'. Tiggsworth, re the inadvertent inclusion of the 79 Caulfield Cup - if I had truly believed that the CC that year had been run at Flemington then I would have put a notation (n.b. run at Flemington).
WRONG AGAIN re: Best 3yo's. Every 3yo listed was exceptional. Surround was brilliant and I have already stated that I wouldn't argue with her placing in such a shortlist. However, she did all her 3yo racing in Victoria whereas Sunline won in both Sydney and Melbourne. To imply that I've put some kind of clearly inferior 3yo's in Surround's place indicates a very poor knowledge of thoroughbred quality assessment.
WRONG AGAIN - The Caulfield Cup WAS run at Flemington in 1941, 1942, 1943. So I have my years correct.
I have stated that I am happy for someone to prove to me that the 1940 CC was run at Flemington but as I reiterate, this is trying to dodge the POINT that Bell Flight and Count both blew it here.
Apologise to the forum Tiggsworth. You can pick up papers for the rest of the day.
Please direct us to the source stating the 1940 Cup was run at Flemo.
Two sites I've seen indicated that only the runnings I mention were run at Flemington. I have no problems with the number being four as long as you can back up your claim. Can you?
But that's trivial. But stop trying to duck the fact that you and Bald Fright tried to play the smart alec game and stuffed up. The inference was that no Caulfield Cups were run at Flemington and I proved you clowns wrong.
Message: Count Plod has already tried to defend Bellinda but as usual he does so by trying to mislead the forum. FACT: Bell Flight smarty-pantsed implied that the Caulfield Cup was never run at Flemington. Both these two clowns have slipped on the same banana skin. Seriously not a brain cell between them.
This site is maintained by Racing and Sports (®) Pty Ltd (ABN 093 360 108) ("R&S").
Copyright in all R&S materials is owned by Racing and Sports Pty Ltd (R&S).
Racing and Sports is a Registered Trademark.
R&S takes all care in the preparation of information appearing on the site, but accepts no responsibility nor warrants the accuracy of the information displayed.
This information is provided for entertainment purposes only. All information including race fields and TAB numbers should be checked with an official source.