Username Password
TalkBack
Racing and Sports now moderates the Talkback forum to ensure posting guidelines are adhered to.
The views expressed on Talkback are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Racing and Sports. You must be a registered user to write postings or send messages to other users. Click here to register.

Order by Date Ascending

How unlucky was Naturalism

 RacePost -- Any Racing topic goes
Page 2 of 2  
  Go to Page: 21.  Next >>  

Author: dockyditelaw 
Timestamp:- 14/9/2004 8:26:14 PM
Subject: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
how unlucky was naturalism?
if luck was on his side would he have been a great?
he was unlucky not to win a cox plate (fall), doncaster (Dittman didnt ride) and japan cup(cracked hoof)

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Torpedo Punt 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 10:25:14 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Better Loosen up was a cert beaten in that cox plate S. Marshall was devastated after the race as was I!
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: vo_rogue58 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 10:17:18 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:

Twelve years after Naturalism, Sydesten and Palace Reign came to grief in the '92 Cox Plate, there's been another casualty...Krapper.

Looks like it's true what they say about bullsh!ters, it becomes harder and harder to keep track of all the BS and eventually you'll slip up.

By the way Krapper, how much did the quinella on first and fifth pay ?. LOL


PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: iglesia 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 9:06:03 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
I seem to remember Damien Oliver engaging in peculiar bumping duel out the back with Veandercross in the 1993 Cox Plate .... didn't seem to realise that the horses he needed to worry about were Solvit and The Phantom Chance.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Mofactor 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 8:26:00 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Once again Khaptingly is exposed. This time with little historical knowledge of racing facts. Everybody knows that Lets Elope was relegated to 5th in Supers Cox Plate and that Kinjite and Slight Chance subsequently filled the places. And he wonders why people like myself constantly get stuck into him. Also wrong about Star Of The Realm being huge odds. He was somewhere in the 5/1 range. Keep up the good work Khaptingly, only next time you make something up, get on the net first and check to see that your facts are right. Your memory is obviously not right.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Bell Flight 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 7:01:49 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Consider this: look at where Naturalism was in the run... he would have ended up right about where Better Loosen Up was - on the inside of Let's Elope who bored in about 6 horses in the straight under pressure. Naturalism likely would have faced the same squeeze that cost Better Loosen Up certain victory...
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: bleeding knows 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 3:40:27 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
the sad thing is if he hadnt had fallen in the 92 cox plate he may have won the year after.
The fall seemed to unnerve him whenever he went to MV after. He was in good form leading into the latter CP (winning the caulfield stakes beating The Phantom brothers). Maybe he could have won 2 CP's. Hmm. Who really knows?

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: iglesia 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 2:12:18 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
It's funny what people remember about the 1992 Cox Plate. People all say that Naturalism was cruising, but consider this. The first half of the race was run in very, very slow time, so it's little wonder. Mick Dittman (and nobody talks about this) got himself into a bit of a bind because he got trapped on the inside and those around him weren't really going into the race. The swoopers, including Let's Elope and Super Impose, had taken off before the fall happened. It was too late for Naturalism to have gotten out and won even had the fall not happened.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: naturalismfan 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 12:53:50 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
it only had four starts outside the top 5


Prize Money: $3255606
Career: 33 - 12 - 9 - 3
First fives: 29

Rating
earned
kg Date Position
Field Length
to the
Winner Distance
Metres Class Track Jockey Name Barrier Carry
Weight Track
Rating Time Race Winner   
--- 3973 Day Spell ---            
71.0 30 Oct 1993 3/16 3.1 2000 G1WFA FLEM D OLIVER 6 59.0 0 121.4 THE PHANTOM   
69.0 23 Oct 1993 4/9 4.1 2040 G1WFA M V D OLIVER 4 59.0 0 122.8 THE PHANTOM CHANCE   
71.5 09 Oct 1993 1/15 0.2 2000 G1WFA CAUL D OLIVER 3 59.0 1 124.7 NATURALISM   
72.0 02 Oct 1993 2/12 0.2 2000 G2HCP FLEM D OLIVER 11 59.0 1 125.7 THE PHANTOM CHANCE   
63.5 18 Sep 1993 5/6 5.6 1600 G2WFA M V L DITTMAN 3 58.5 3 99.9 PALACE REIGN   
68.0 04 Sep 1993 3/8 1.9 1400 G2WFA CAUL L DITTMAN 1 58.5 2 85.4 PALACE REIGN   
--- 140 Day Spell ---            
73.5 17 Apr 1993 2/11 0.2 1600 G1WFA RAND L DITTMAN 8 57.0 2 97.1 ROUGH HABIT   
75.0 10 Apr 1993 7/20 2.7 1600 G1HCP RAND N G HARRIS 2 59.5 0 94.0 SKATING   
71.5 20 Mar 1993 2/8 1.3 2000 G1WFA RHIL L DITTMAN 5 57.0 0 121.6 VEANDERCROSS   
72.0 13 Mar 1993 1/11 0.3 1900 G3HCP CANT L DITTMAN 6 60.0 2 118.8 NATURALISM   
70.5 27 Feb 1993 1/7 1.3 1400 G2WFA W FM L DITTMAN 6 57.0 0 81.9 NATURALISM   
0.0 15 Feb 1993 1/10 0.1 900 TRIAL EPSM UNKNOWN 1 48.0 0 55.0 NATURALISM   
--- 78 Day Spell ---            
0.0 29 Nov 1992 2/14 0.3 2400 U JAP. L DITTMAN 0 0.0 S 144.6    
75.0 07 Nov 1992 1/12 0.1 2000 G4HCP FLEM L DITTMAN 8 63.0 0 121.5 NATURALISM   
0.0 24 Oct 1992 99/14 99.0 2040 G1WFA M V L DITTMAN 5 57.0 0 125.5 SUPER IMPOSE   
72.0 03 Oct 1992 1/12 3.0 2000 G2HCP FLEM S MARSHALL 12 57.0 0 123.0 NATURALISM   
70.5 19 Sep 1992 1/8 6.0 1600 G2WFA M V L DITTMAN 8 57.0 4 100.8 NATURALISM   
70.5 05 Sep 1992 1/10 3.5 1400 G2WFA CAUL S MARSHALL 10 57.0 3 87.1 NATURALISM   
62.5 22 Aug 1992 5/12 3.3 1200 HCP W FM S ARNOLD 9 55.5 0 69.9 CAVALIER   
43.0 10 Aug 1992 2/9 1.9 1030 TRIAL RHIL DITTMAN 1 48.0 2 63.6 SHOESHINE HENRY   
--- 114 Day Spell ---            
70.5 18 Apr 1992 1/15 0.8 2400 3G1SWT RAND L DITTMAN 14 55.5 0 151.2 NATURALISM   
70.5 04 Apr 1992 1/16 0.2 2000 3G1SWT RHIL L DITTMAN 5 55.5 1 125.1 NATURALISM   
68.0 21 Mar 1992 2/14 1.3 1900 3G1SWT CANT L DITTMAN 10 55.5 0 115.1 VEANDERCROSS   
67.0 14 Mar 1992 1/9 3.3 2040 3G2SWT M V L DITTMAN 3 54.0 1 126.3 NATURALISM   
65.0 29 Feb 1992 4/10 1.6 1800 3G3SWT CAUL L DITTMAN 4 55.5 1 109.8 LARANTO   
65.0 15 Feb 1992 2/10 0.3 1600 3G1SWT FLEM R S DYE 4 55.5 0 94.0 JOLLY OLD MAC   
63.5 08 Feb 1992 4/10 1.3 1400 3G3SWT SAND K RUSSELL 1 57.5 0 82.4 LARANTO   
0.0 03 Feb 1992 1/6 1.0 1050 TRIAL M V UNKNOWN 1 48.0 0 71.4 NATURALISM   
59.5 25 Jan 1992 6/7 3.6 1200 3G4SWT CAUL D OLIVER 6 57.5 0 69.8 MY SATURN STAR   
0.0 20 Jan 1992 1/10 0.5 900 TRIAL EPSM UNKNOWN 1 48.0 0 54.5 NATURALISM   
--- 79 Day Spell ---            
66.5 02 Nov 1991 2/17 2.0 2500 3G1SWT FLEM D OLIVER 12 55.5 0 153.6 STAR OF THE REALM   
66.0 26 Oct 1991 1/11 4.0 2040 3G3SWT M V D OLIVER 2 55.5 1 124.9 NATURALISM   
65.5 12 Oct 1991 2/16 0.5 1600 3G1SWT CAUL D OLIVER 5 55.5 0 96.7 CHORTLE   
55.5 05 Oct 1991 12/15 6.6 1400 3CG4SW FLEM D OLIVER 3 54.5 0 84.5 MANGO'S LUNCH   
56.0 21 Sep 1991 3/9 4.0 1200 3CG3SW M V J CASSIDY 1 53.0 3 74.0 HULA GREY   
62.5 07 Sep 1991 2/10 0.8 1100 3G4SWT CAUL D OLIVER 7 52.5 2 65.6 TIERCE   
--- 175 Day Spell ---            
58.0 16 Mar 1991 1/12 2.0 1200 2YCHCP M V D OLIVER 7 52.0 0 70.9 NATURALISM

wat a career

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Spinning Knight 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 12:49:36 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Hey Khrapper,

This is new record for yourself, tipping after nearly 13 years well done old chap.

Any idea's on the '91 Melbourne Cup yet ????
(i'll leave wether it's 1891 or 1991 upto you).

Seriously, a belated hip hip hooray..


PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: mcgarret 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 12:38:03 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Commish

You da man in the interview room!

lol

Cheers...McGarret

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: bleeding knows 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 12:13:01 PM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
ah star of the realm was about 6-1, hardly long odds
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: bardock 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 11:55:39 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:

After Naturalism won the Rosehill Guineas - beating Veandercross - the press told Mick Dittman
how lucky he was to beat Veandercross. Mick agreed.
I doubled my bet on Naturalism in the AJC Derby.In racing it pays to learn to read between the lines.
In the Derby, Naturalism was again ' lucky ' to beat Veandercross.
Very good horse.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: The Commissioner 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 11:30:49 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Hah Khap

If you're going to continue with your porkies, you could at least get your stats correct.

Didn't you get the first 4 in that race as well?

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Pinkline Jones 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 10:55:08 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Khaptingly,

How in the Sunline's Dikkens can you claim Naturalism to be "overrated". Tell me how many Australasian horses we've had that were capable of going within a neck of winning the hardest 2400m race in the world i.e Japan Cup?

PINKLINE

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Pinkline Jones 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 10:51:56 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
It was SYDESTON you silly painting clown.
Naturalism was a great galloper at that time but what about the run of BLU.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: camel56 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 10:47:49 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
lol Khrapper exposed yet again i do believe. Perhaps he'll run off crying for more than a week this time, we can only hope.
On the declaring it the derby winner to everyone, no doubt they were a little disappointed to hear the tip 2 hours after the last.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: northerlythegreat 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 9:52:18 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
I thought veandercross was better. should have won both cups and a back injury wrecked his career the year after.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: northerlythegreat 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 9:34:50 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
rofl
khrapper caught out lying again.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Rogan Josh 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 9:34:32 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Naturalism was one of my favourite horses. The clashes with Veadercross as Autumn 3yos with them running the quinela in the canterbury and rosehill guineas and the AJC derby. They always beat the third horse easily.

It is a real shame what happened in the cox plate. He was travelling so easy just before the fall. He looks to be cruising where all those around him look to be under pressure. He was in such great form that Spring.   

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: catweazle 
Timestamp:- 15/9/2004 9:25:57 AM
Subject: Re: How unlucky was Naturalism

Message:
Khapper, Let's Elope finished 5th in the Cox Plate after losing a protest - collecting on a SI/LE Quin/Tri seems unlikely. Your ability to even tip in hindsight seems to be failing these days.
PostPost a reply to this message.

Page 2 of 2  
  Go to Page: 21.  Next >>  

 
 

Racing and Sports Racing and Sports Pty Ltd | Contact Us | R&S Terms of Use | R&S Privacy
This site is maintained by Racing and Sports (®) Pty Ltd (ABN 093 360 108) ("R&S"). Copyright in all R&S materials is owned by Racing and Sports Pty Ltd (R&S). Racing and Sports is a Registered Trademark. R&S takes all care in the preparation of information appearing on the site, but accepts no responsibility nor warrants the accuracy of the information displayed. This information is provided for entertainment purposes only. All information including race fields and TAB numbers should be checked with an official source. (RAS-WWW02) (ADS1)