Username Password
TalkBack
Racing and Sports now moderates the Talkback forum to ensure posting guidelines are adhered to.
The views expressed on Talkback are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Racing and Sports. You must be a registered user to write postings or send messages to other users. Click here to register.

Order by Date Ascending

US Masters

 Golf -- Discuss Golf
Page 2 of 2  
  Go to Page: 21.  Next >>  

Author: lauriedarkie 
Timestamp:- 6/4/2004 4:35:47 PM
Subject: US Masters

Message:
The Masters has sneeked up on us again. With all the good racing at the moment, it may have been overlooked. Golf throws up some value winnersif you can aim the dart right.

Currently Tiger is favourite at around the $5 mark, which seems unders given his form (lack of wins) at the moment. Mickelson is @ about $9 and is in pretty good form, but has a shocking record in majors. Vijay Singh is about the same price and has some solid form around him. He also seems to be a tough bastard and would have to rate as a big chance.

Defending champion Weir is at about $25 and has been playing well. Titleholders don't seem to back up though. Padraig Harrington is the top ranked European and is in good form at the minute and is at about the $21 mark. He seems like a reasonable bet to me (each way). Perhaps a saver on Singh to win. What do others think?
Cheers
LD


PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: winmar7 
Timestamp:- 16/4/2004 11:25:23 AM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Two in fact.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: CK Dexter-Haven 
Timestamp:- 15/4/2004 11:55:31 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Norman did win a major hondo...
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: hondo 
Timestamp:- 15/4/2004 8:51:02 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Pinkline
Yes Greg won. He always wins. They are sending Matt Shirvington and the captain of the Socceroos over to present the jacket. It is similar to the one that Robert Redford wore in the Ëlectric Horseman". Lots of flashing lights spelling out his title. DUD
How can they say Mickelson was the unluckiest player not to have won a major. They should have some respect for our stellar dud.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Pinkline Jones 
Timestamp:- 15/4/2004 3:39:46 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Laurie,

Did Greg Norman win - I couldn't get the reception?

PINKLINE

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Lagent 
Timestamp:- 15/4/2004 2:51:05 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
See if this clears it up…..as per earlier postings, I find that betting at the beginning of a tournament offers no value (as does Tiger at 5/1); and the only golf betting that seems to work for me is a punt at the halfway mark of a tournament.

This years Masters was a no bet for me, as I didn’t like anyone after the second round. I looked at Phil, but couldn’t bring myself to throw good money after bad (great decision wasn’t it!).

I know I am not alone in backing Phil Mickelson previously and being burnt. That is one long list of punters!

I don’t dislike Phil nor not rate his golf (my pun was meant as a sarcastic gag)
That is why I referred to Phil was a bookies dream. Everyone I know of or have spoken to are sworn off him (except JR on this thread) and now he comes out and wins....

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: catweazle 
Timestamp:- 15/4/2004 12:50:21 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Now I'm more confused, I thought you weren't going to bet on it.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Lagent 
Timestamp:- 15/4/2004 10:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Thats the problem with the written word - it is difficult to express sarcasm.

Cat, I don't really believe he is the most ordinary golfer to win a major. I actually think he is a fine golfer too, it is just hard to forgive betting losses.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: bardock 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 4:31:12 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:

gamblers anonymous     02 9564 1574

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: CK Dexter-Haven 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 2:35:52 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Anyone who can shoot 31 for the back nine on Sunday at Augusta, under the sort of pressure he would have been under, more than deserves their victory.
Outstanding performance.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: catweazle 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 2:29:01 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
On the contrary Lagent, Mickelsen is among the finer major winners.

He is a long way ahead of many other recent major winners (still scratching my head about Ben Curtis winning last years British Open).

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: JR 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 1:35:12 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Thanks Cat, yes it was great to have the money on him as well as really wanting him to win anyway. What a great final round it was!
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Lagent 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 12:05:14 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
It was definitely riviting viewing. You can only imagine how elated Lefty was to see that last putt 'just' loop into the hole.

Does this mean Phil becomes one of the most ordinary players to win a major?!?

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: CK Dexter-Haven 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 10:50:34 AM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Can't agree with you there Daytripper, there is no 'form' in golf. Performances differ enormously from week to week. Players might play a certain course well, in general, but that's not enough to bet on.
No value at all in golf betting in my opinion. Apart from laying Tiger of course!

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: lauriedarkie 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 10:29:30 AM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Padraig Harrington now becomes the best player never to win a major.
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: catweazle 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 10:06:55 AM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Congrats JR. It was great viewing on Monday morning, even though I'd done my money. You must've loved it when that last putt snuck in the back of the cup.

I'd sworn off Mickelsen in majors. In hindsight though, 3 top 3 finishes in the previous 3 years, how the heck didn't I factor that in before the event.....

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Lagent 
Timestamp:- 14/4/2004 9:04:58 AM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Lefty just continues to be a bookies dream...
PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Daytripper 
Timestamp:- 8/4/2004 7:33:47 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Pinkline - please go - this is a serious discussion. Your comments are not funny and are not welcome.

Lagent,
Have to agree with Catweasle. Golf is the best value betting medium going around. All you need is one winner for the year and you will be ahead. But you must be prepared to put some work into it and study as much form as possible. You will be rewarded handsomely if you make the right decisions.

Good luck to all with the Masters betting.




PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: Lagent 
Timestamp:- 8/4/2004 4:33:10 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Good work if you can get a result out of golf Cat. All I know is that bookies love betting the golf. Apart from Tigers big winning streak 18+ months back - it is just cream to them.

Suppose my point was (which you highlighted as well) - a tiger in indifferent form is questionable value at 5/1 in a 90 strong field.

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: JR 
Timestamp:- 8/4/2004 3:15:35 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Sergio is a better chance of missing the cut than he is of winning it.

I'm backing michelson and verplank

PostPost a reply to this message.


Author: catweazle 
Timestamp:- 8/4/2004 1:28:07 PM
Subject: Re: US Masters

Message:
Lagent, you would be suprised. I keep itemised records on all my sportsbetting and over the years have tried AFL, cricket, golf, tennis, soccer and basketball.

I have given tennis, soccer and basketball the flick because I can't get a regular return out of them.

Golf, along with cricket, every year provides me with the best return on investment.

The great thing is you can spread your bets around several players given the huge odds available.

Of course you don't win every tournament, but no-one wins on every horse race either.

You say Woods is not value at $5, but his Augusta record as a pro is 3 wins in 8 attempts, so $5 is not unreasonably short (despite his relatively indifferent form at present).

He is 1 of 6 players I have backed this tournament, along with Harrington, Weir, Perry, Olazabal and Chad Campbell.

If any of these win, I will more or less triple my money, if they don't I'm still well ahead for the year.

PostPost a reply to this message.

Page 2 of 2  
  Go to Page: 21.  Next >>  

 
 

Racing and Sports Racing and Sports Pty Ltd | Contact Us | R&S Terms of Use | R&S Privacy
This site is maintained by Racing and Sports (®) Pty Ltd (ABN 093 360 108) ("R&S"). Copyright in all R&S materials is owned by Racing and Sports Pty Ltd (R&S). Racing and Sports is a Registered Trademark. R&S takes all care in the preparation of information appearing on the site, but accepts no responsibility nor warrants the accuracy of the information displayed. This information is provided for entertainment purposes only. All information including race fields and TAB numbers should be checked with an official source. (RAS-WWW02) (ADS1)