The views expressed on Talkback are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Racing and Sports. You must be a registered user to write postings or send messages to other users. Click here to register.

Order by Date Ascending

 Neural Workshop -- Neural algorithms forum

Page 1 of 1

---

Author: flanigan  Timestamp:- 5/5/2008 10:16:47 PM Subject: NEURAL SELECTIONS Message: Sels from neurals 6th May SALE R2 7 PROTESTA [getting a bit expensive this one]. R4 8 STANDARD R5 2 GENTRY R6 1 RAEBURN[ditto this one] R7 5 TWIN TRIST ALL SETTINGS AT 3 EXCEPT TIM AT 1, AND WT AT 0. RATED TO A GOOD/DEAD TRACK. IF TRACK IS SLOW/HEAVY NO SEL. QUALIFIES. IF LESS THAN $2 OR OVER $8 [S/TAB], NOT QUAL. GO TO NEXT SEL. AND ONLY AFTER 1ST TO WIN. Hi Jezza hope this helps, will also send a note to your inbox shortly. Regards Flanigan

Post a reply to this message.

---

---

Author: Alcatraz  Timestamp:- 6/5/2008 8:17:14 AM Subject: Re: NEURAL SELECTIONS Message: Flanigan, hi You may already consider this, but in races 1400m+, moreso 1500m+, the DLR5 rating can be worth looking at. When a runner comes up with 25 points or less, on DLR5, generally a big risk. 27 points, not too bad, but 28-33 points, have fitness on their side. I know someone who only looks at 30 or 33 point runners in races of 1600m+. Comes up with top value at times. Today at Sale, DLR5, you have R2 H7, 27 points                              R4 H8, 27 points                              R6 H1, 25 points Me even mentioning this, should make them all winners!!!! I also know someone who tops up his pension from the neurals. Default setting, he only backs those which have over 'x' points in total and where 5 or 6 factors head the points totals. Not 100% sure of the precise rules. The selections are always short and not many of them, but winners keep coming. All the best.

Post a reply to this message.

---

Page 1 of 1