Sunday, 1 July 2012:

Lance Armstrong shrugged off the US Anti-Doping Agency's decision to file formal doping charges against him, saying on Saturday he wouldn't let it halt his cancer awareness work.

"I refuse to be distracted by @usantidoping's antics," the seven-time Tour de France champion said on Twitter, a day after USADA announced it had filed the charges that could cost him his seven titles in the world's most prestigious cycling race.

"It's 2012, I'm gonna continue to lead @LIVESTRONG, raise my 5 kids, and stay fit!" Armstrong tweeted.

A three-member review panel evaluated evidence gathered by USADA and a reply from Armstrong before unanimously voting to turn the allegations revealed on June 13 into formal charges.

The next step in the process will be a hearing before an arbitration panel. Their verdict could be appealed and the matter could be pushed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) for a final resolution.

USADA claims it has witnesses to the fact that Armstrong and five former team associates -- including Italian doctor Michele Ferrari and team manager Johan Bruyneel -- engaged in a doping conspiracy from 1998-2011.

Armstrong, who won the Tour de France seven years running from 1999-2005 and used his fame to fuel his charitable work for anti-cancer causes through his Livestrong foundation, has never tested positive and the 40-year-old US cycling legend has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing.

Armstrong would be allowed to review the USADA evidence in advance and cross-examine any witnesses against him.

Last week, in his 18-page reply to USADA's allegations, Armstrong asked the review panel to dismiss the charges, saying the anti-doping group had not offered sufficient proof.

The review panel instead dismissed his position.

Just a day ago, Armstrong said the credibility of USADA's case has been undermined by the fact that two key witnesses, Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton, are confessed doping cheats themselves.

USADA has said previously that at least 10 former Armstrong teammates and associates would testify against him, but vowed to keep the names confidential.

Armstrong called the allegations against him "baseless" and said the case only recycles "discredited" allegations from the past.

His attorney Robert Luskin said that, in its pursuit of Armstrong, USADA had "sacrificed the very principles of fair play that it was created to safeguard".

"USADA has compiled a disgraceful record of arrogance ... and contempt for due process," Luskin said.

AAP