[close]

One of the many facilities Racing And Sports provides for all users is the ability to access "audio" content. Because of our significant domestic and international presence at the race track and of it, not only are we delivering extensive racing information and technology along with form content, you can avail yourself of a substantial amount of interviews conducted by the Racing And Sports team.

They include discussions with Jockeys, Trainers and Owners through the week, Post-Race interviews, Press conferences at major meetings and also Race Day Previews from our racing staff. All these emanate from racing right around the world.

Forum - Don Scott Ratings

Don Scott Ratings

Order by Date Ascending

 Our Staff -- Post a message to Gary or one of our staff
Page 1 of 1



Original Blog Post:

This question possibly has been raised before, and sorry if it has. Lately I've been spending some time following the Don Scott ratings on your site, and I am thoroughly impressed with the work that obviously goes into them, and for free also.

One thing that I just noticed concerns the penalties/plusses on the "Worksheet" page for the jockeys. This of course has a relevant bearing on the final rating figure.

How does a jockey like D. Beadman get a 1.5 plus figure when he has a strike rate of 25.5 as opposed to say G. Colless also with a 1.5 plus figure when he has a strike rate of 17.5. Then you get say B. Pengelly with a plus figure of 2.5 when he has a strike rate of 18.4.

For todays Eagle Farm meeting I also noticed S. Seamer with a minus 1.0 in race 7, and then with a "0" in race 8...?

I realise that one has the facility to change this rating figure, but I would have thought that the "default" figure was based on jockeys records.

Any comments please.

Regards
Paul

 
Author: pauls
Subject: Don Scott Ratings

Time: 11/6/2007 7:36:17 PM
 
Post a replyPost a reply to this message.



Author: Robert
Subject: Re: Don Scott Ratings

Time: 12/6/2007 12:52:53 AM

Blog Reply:

Pauls,

Jockey ratings are also dependant on distance and are not based soley on win strike rate.

The "Est Ratings" shown on the "ratings" page is not the not Final Rating based on the worksheet - it is there simply as a worked ratings guide on that page.

Hope this helps,
Robert Vilkaitis

 
Post a replyPost a reply to this message.



Author: GunPunter
Subject: Re: Don Scott Ratings

Time: 11/6/2007 10:38:49 PM

Blog Reply:

"I have found that this is by far the best form analysis tool out there."

But is it profitable?

Analysis means nothing if it ain't profitable.

If you don't understand the formulas behind it, how can you trust it? Better to work out your own method.


 
Post a replyPost a reply to this message.



Author: pauls
Subject: Re: Don Scott Ratings

Time: 11/6/2007 10:10:23 PM

Blog Reply:

hi there Loosenup, and thanks for your reply, I totally agree.

I would have thought that the Est Ratings shown on the "ratings" page should be the same as the BRR figure on the "worksheet" page and then you adjust from that. It's some years now since I read the final one of Don's books, so I cant remember his exact formulas.

I am now wondering if I should have been paying more attention to the ratings on the "ratings" page rather than the FR on the "worksheets" page.

And I think your right there about having to rerate the jockeys to your individual thoughts, I guess you have a set of figures that you have arrived at.

Time to ponder again,....!!

Paul

 
Post a replyPost a reply to this message.



Author: loosenup
Subject: Re: Don Scott Ratings

Time: 11/6/2007 9:04:09 PM

Blog Reply:

Paul,I agree with what you say, when I use the worksheet, I completely rerate the jockey figures. I also find that the base run rating can be out in terms of the way Don Scott says it should be arrived at in his book.

I also cant understand how the rating figure in the tab about three or four to the left of the worksheet is often so inconsistent with the worksheet when all I would have thought the worksheet would be for is to make an adjustment of the ratings sheet if you dont agree with something in it.

It would be good if someone from the site could advise exactly how the ratings figures in the form tab are arrived at. Are they relative to the weight the horse is carrying that day.

Having said this, I have found that this is by far the best form analysis tool out there.

 
Post a replyPost a reply to this message.


Page 1 of 1


Racing and Sports now moderates the Talkback forum to ensure posting guidelines are adhered to.
The views expressed on Talkback are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Racing and Sports. You must be a registered user to write postings or send messages to other users. Click here to register.